Social Cognitive Learning Theory: A Comprehensive Guide for Educators

Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) provides a robust framework for understanding how individuals learn in social contexts. This theory, primarily developed by Albert Bandura, moves beyond traditional behaviorist approaches by emphasizing the critical roles of observation, imitation, and cognitive processes in learning. For educators, understanding SCT offers valuable strategies to enhance teaching methods and foster student success.

The Story of Social Cognitive Theory: From Bobo Dolls to Modern Classrooms

Image 1: Children in a classroom setting, representing the target audience for social cognitive learning theory applications.

Imagine a classroom where students struggle to follow instructions, leading to confusion and teacher exhaustion. This was the reality for Ms. Mitchell, a science teacher looking for a better way to engage her students. By simply modeling each step of a science project, Ms. Mitchell transformed her classroom. Students quickly grasped the concepts, engaged with the activity, and even helped each other. This scenario perfectly illustrates the power of observational learning and the core principles of social cognitive theory. Ms. Mitchell’s success wasn’t just about demonstrating; it was about leveraging the social context of learning, incorporating modeling, encouragement, and group interaction to boost student engagement and confidence.

To truly appreciate the impact of SCT, it’s essential to understand its origins and the mind behind it, Albert Bandura.

Albert Bandura: The Architect of Social Cognitive Theory

Image 2: Portrait of Albert Bandura, a prominent figure in psychology and the developer of social cognitive theory.

Born in 1925 in Mundare, Canada, Albert Bandura’s early life experiences significantly shaped his groundbreaking work in psychology. Growing up in a small town with limited educational resources, Bandura learned the value of self-directed learning and the importance of community. His parents, immigrants from Eastern Europe, instilled in him a strong emphasis on family and education, values that would later underpin his social learning theories.

Bandura’s academic journey began at the University of British Columbia, where he graduated with the Bolocan Award in Psychology in 1949. He then pursued graduate studies at the University of Iowa, a hub for social learning theory research at the time. By 1952, he had earned his Master’s and Ph.D. in clinical psychology. After a stint at the Wichita Guidance Center, Bandura joined Stanford University in 1953, where he remained throughout his illustrious career.

Initially, Bandura’s research explored various aspects of human behavior, including aggression in adolescents, self-regulation in children, and self-efficacy – a person’s belief in their ability to succeed in specific situations or accomplish a task. His most famous contribution came from the Bobo doll experiments in the 1960s. These experiments challenged the prevailing behaviorist view that learning was solely the result of direct reinforcement.

The Bobo Doll Experiment: A Paradigm Shift in Learning Theory

Image 3: A still from the Bobo Doll experiment, showcasing a child imitating aggressive behavior modeled by an adult.

The Bobo doll experiments were revolutionary. Bandura demonstrated that children could learn behaviors simply by observing a model, even in the absence of direct reinforcement. In these experiments, children watched adults interact with a Bobo doll – an inflatable toy. Some children observed adults behaving aggressively towards the doll, while others saw non-aggressive behavior. The results were striking: children who witnessed aggressive behavior were significantly more likely to act aggressively towards the Bobo doll themselves, imitating the actions they had observed. This groundbreaking research formed the foundation of Bandura’s social learning theory, which later evolved into social cognitive theory in 1986 with the publication of his seminal book, “Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.”

Bandura renamed his theory to emphasize the crucial role of cognition in social learning. Social cognitive theory posits that learning occurs within a social context, driven by a dynamic interplay between personal factors, behavior, and the environment – a concept known as reciprocal determinism. This perspective highlights that individuals are not passive recipients of environmental influences but active agents in their learning and development.

Reciprocal Determinism: The Interplay of Person, Behavior, and Environment

Figure 1: Reciprocal Determinism

Figure 1: A diagram illustrating the principle of reciprocal determinism in social cognitive theory.

At the heart of social cognitive theory is the principle of reciprocal determinism. This concept suggests that behavior, personal factors (including cognition, emotions, and biological events), and environmental factors operate as interacting determinants that influence each other bidirectionally. It’s not a simple linear cause-and-effect relationship, but a continuous loop of interaction.

• Personal Factors: These include cognitive, affective, and biological characteristics. For example, self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and even physiological responses are personal factors that can influence behavior and are influenced by the environment.
• Behavioral Factors: This encompasses motor responses, verbal responses, and social interactions. Behaviors are not simply reactions to the environment; they are also actions that can change the environment and personal cognitions.
• Environmental Factors: This includes the physical environment, social environment, cultural norms, and technological settings. The environment provides opportunities, resources, and constraints that influence behavior and personal factors.

Bandura’s research showed that reciprocal determinism is evident in everyday life. For instance, studies on aggression revealed that hostile behavior often elicits hostile responses, while non-hostile actions rarely lead to aggression. This highlights how behavior shapes the environment and, in turn, influences future behavior and personal factors.

Key Components of Social Cognitive Theory

Social cognitive theory provides a detailed framework for understanding observational learning and its underlying processes. The core concepts revolve around how individuals acquire knowledge, skills, strategies, beliefs, and attitudes by observing others.

Observational Learning and Modeling: Learning by Watching

Observational learning, also known as modeling, is a cornerstone of social cognitive theory. It emphasizes that individuals learn by observing others’ behaviors and the consequences of those behaviors. This type of learning is far more efficient than trial-and-error learning alone. As Bandura stated, “Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do.”

For observational learning to be effective, four key processes are involved:

1. Attention: The learner must pay attention to the model. Factors influencing attention include model characteristics (e.g., attractiveness, credibility), observer characteristics (e.g., motivation, expectations), and situational characteristics (e.g., relevance, complexity).
2. Retention: The learner must remember what they have observed. This involves mentally representing the model’s behavior in memory, often through verbal descriptions or visual images.
3. Production: The learner must be able to reproduce the observed behavior. This involves converting the mental representations into physical actions, which requires practice and feedback.
4. Motivation: The learner must be motivated to perform the behavior. Motivation is influenced by outcome expectancies – the anticipated consequences of imitating the behavior. If the learner believes that imitating the modeled behavior will lead to positive outcomes, they are more likely to be motivated to do so.

Outcome Expectancies: Anticipating Consequences

Outcome expectancies are crucial in social cognitive theory. They refer to an individual’s beliefs about the likely consequences of performing a particular behavior. These expectancies are learned through observation and direct experience. Learners don’t simply mimic behaviors blindly; they evaluate the potential outcomes of those behaviors. If they observe a model being rewarded for a behavior, they are more likely to expect similar rewards for imitating that behavior. Conversely, if they see a model being punished, they are less likely to imitate.

Outcome expectancies are heavily influenced by the environment and cultural context. For example, the consequences of certain behaviors can vary significantly across cultures and settings. In the classroom, teachers play a vital role in shaping students’ outcome expectancies by clearly communicating the consequences of different behaviors and ensuring that positive behaviors lead to meaningful and valuable outcomes for students.

Self-Regulation: Taking Control of Learning

Self-regulation is another critical component of social cognitive theory. It refers to the processes individuals use to control their own behavior, thoughts, and emotions in pursuit of goals. Self-regulation involves setting goals, monitoring progress, and adjusting strategies as needed. It encompasses both self-reinforcement and self-punishment.

• Self-reinforcement involves rewarding oneself for meeting self-set standards or goals. This can be through tangible rewards or self-praise. Self-reinforcement is a powerful motivator, driving individuals to persist in the face of challenges.
• Self-punishment involves criticizing or penalizing oneself for failing to meet self-set standards. While self-punishment can be motivating to some extent, excessive self-criticism can be detrimental to self-efficacy and motivation.

Self-regulation is heavily influenced by cognitive processes and is essential for academic success, personal development, and overall well-being. Learners who are skilled at self-regulation are more likely to be proactive, persistent, and successful in achieving their goals.

Self-Efficacy: Believing in Your Abilities

Image 4: Children engaged in a hands-on learning activity, symbolizing mastery experience and self-efficacy development.

Self-efficacy is a central concept in social cognitive theory and refers to an individual’s belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments. It is about perceived capability – believing you can succeed at a task. Self-efficacy beliefs are powerful predictors of motivation, learning, and performance. Individuals with high self-efficacy are more likely to take on challenging tasks, persist through difficulties, and recover quickly from setbacks.

Self-efficacy is not a fixed trait; it can be developed and enhanced through various sources:

• Mastery Experiences: Direct experiences of success are the most powerful source of self-efficacy. Successfully accomplishing challenging tasks, especially after initial struggles, builds a strong sense of competence. Educators can foster mastery experiences by designing tasks that are challenging yet achievable and providing appropriate support and scaffolding.
• Social Modeling (Vicarious Experiences): Observing others succeed, especially those perceived as similar to oneself, can boost self-efficacy. Seeing models perform tasks successfully provides vicarious experiences of mastery. Teachers can use peer modeling, video demonstrations, and guest speakers to provide effective social models.
• Social Persuasion (Verbal Persuasion): Encouragement and positive feedback from credible sources can enhance self-efficacy. Verbal persuasion is most effective when it is realistic and specific, focusing on effort and progress rather than just general praise. Teachers can use constructive feedback, encouragement, and positive communication to persuade students of their capabilities.
• Emotional and Physiological States: Emotional and physical states can influence self-efficacy beliefs. Positive emotions and feeling physically well can enhance self-efficacy, while negative emotions and stress can undermine it. Educators can create a supportive and positive learning environment, reduce anxiety, and teach stress-management techniques to optimize students’ emotional and physiological states for learning.

Self-efficacy is crucial in educational settings. Students with high self-efficacy are more engaged, motivated, and persistent learners. Teachers play a key role in nurturing students’ self-efficacy by providing opportunities for mastery, offering positive role models, giving encouraging feedback, and creating a supportive learning environment.

Human Capabilities: The Foundation of Social Cognitive Learning

Social cognitive theory highlights several unique human capabilities that underpin social learning. These capabilities distinguish human learning from simpler forms of learning observed in other species.

1. Symbolizing Capability: Learning Through Representation

Symbolizing capability refers to the human ability to use symbols, such as language and imagery, to represent and understand experiences. This allows individuals to learn not only from direct experience but also from indirect, symbolic communication. We can understand abstract concepts, imagine future events, and learn from history through symbols.

• Example: Students learn about historical events by reading books and watching documentaries. They can discuss and analyze these events using language, developing an understanding of the past and its relevance to the present.

2. Self-Regulatory Capability: Guiding Our Actions

Self-regulatory capability enables individuals to control their own behavior, set goals, and plan actions to achieve those goals. This involves self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reaction. We can motivate ourselves, guide our actions, and adjust our behavior based on feedback and self-reflection.

• Example: Students set academic goals for themselves, such as completing assignments on time or improving their grades. They create study plans, monitor their progress, and adjust their strategies as needed to achieve their goals.

3. Self-Reflective Capability: Thinking About Our Thinking

Self-reflective capability is the ability to think about our own thoughts, beliefs, and actions. This metacognitive capacity allows us to evaluate our thinking processes, judge the soundness of our thoughts, and make adjustments as needed. We can analyze our experiences, learn from our mistakes, and refine our understanding of ourselves and the world.

• Example: Students reflect on their learning process after completing a project. They consider what strategies worked well, what challenges they faced, and how they could improve their approach in the future.

4. Vicarious Capability: Learning Through Observation

Vicarious capability, as discussed earlier in observational learning, allows individuals to learn by observing others without direct experience. This significantly expands our learning potential and makes social learning incredibly efficient. We can acquire new skills, knowledge, and attitudes by watching models, learning from their successes and mistakes.

• Example: Students learn how to solve a math problem by watching the teacher or a peer demonstrate the solution process. They can then apply this knowledge to solve similar problems themselves.

These four human capabilities – symbolizing, self-regulation, self-reflection, and vicarious learning – are fundamental to social cognitive theory and highlight the complexity and richness of human learning in social contexts.

The Influence of Social Interaction and Development

Social interaction plays a pivotal role in social cognitive theory, particularly in educational settings and throughout development. As children grow, their social world expands, and interactions with peers and educators become increasingly influential.

Social Interaction in the Classroom

Image 5: A teacher interacting with students, demonstrating the importance of social interaction in fostering self-efficacy and learning.

The classroom is a rich social environment where students constantly observe and interact with teachers and peers. These interactions provide numerous opportunities for observational learning, modeling, and self-efficacy development. Teachers serve as critical models, demonstrating academic skills, problem-solving strategies, and positive social behaviors. Peer interactions also offer valuable learning experiences. Students learn from each other, observe different approaches to tasks, and gain vicarious experiences of success and failure.

However, social interactions can also have negative consequences. Social comparisons in the classroom can impact self-efficacy, especially for students who perceive themselves as less competent than their peers. It is crucial for educators to foster a supportive and inclusive classroom environment where students feel valued and capable, regardless of their perceived abilities relative to others.

Adolescence and Beyond

Image 6: Teenagers playing musical instruments together, representing peer influence and self-efficacy development during adolescence.

As children transition into adolescence and adulthood, social cognitive theory remains highly relevant. Adolescence is a period of significant social and personal development, where peer influence becomes particularly strong. Teenagers learn from observing their peers’ behaviors, attitudes, and choices, and peer groups can serve as powerful models for both positive and negative behaviors.

Developing a strong sense of self-efficacy is crucial during adolescence as individuals navigate new challenges and responsibilities. Past experiences of mastery, social support, and positive self-beliefs contribute to a healthy sense of self-efficacy, which is essential for motivation, resilience, and success in adulthood. In adulthood, self-efficacy continues to be a key factor in career choices, personal relationships, and overall life satisfaction.

Impact and Applications of Social Cognitive Theory

Social cognitive theory has had a profound impact across various fields, extending far beyond educational psychology. Its principles have been applied to understand and address a wide range of human behaviors and social issues.

Broad Applications

• Education: SCT provides a theoretical foundation for effective teaching strategies, classroom management techniques, and interventions to enhance student motivation and achievement.
• Health Promotion: SCT has been instrumental in designing health interventions aimed at promoting healthy behaviors, such as smoking cessation, exercise adoption, and disease prevention. By focusing on self-efficacy, modeling, and outcome expectancies, SCT-based interventions have proven effective in changing health behaviors.
• Mass Communication: Bandura himself explored the application of SCT to mass communication, analyzing how media influences thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. SCT helps explain how media modeling can shape social norms, attitudes, and behaviors across large populations.
• Organizational Behavior: SCT principles are used to understand motivation, leadership, teamwork, and organizational learning in workplace settings. Self-efficacy, observational learning, and self-regulation are key factors in employee performance and organizational effectiveness.
• Career Development: SCT informs career counseling and interventions aimed at promoting career exploration, choice, and development. Self-efficacy beliefs about career-related skills and tasks play a significant role in career decisions and success.
• Addressing Global Issues: Bandura advocated for using SCT to address pressing global issues such as climate change, poverty, and population growth. He proposed that SCT principles, particularly media modeling, could be used to promote pro-environmental behaviors, reduce gender inequality, and encourage sustainable practices.

Social Cognitive Theory in the Classroom: Practical Implications

Image 7: A teacher guiding a student, representing the supportive role of educators in applying social cognitive theory.

Social cognitive theory offers numerous practical implications for classroom teaching and learning:

1. Leverage Observational Learning: Teachers should recognize that students learn a great deal by observing them and their peers. Modeling effective problem-solving strategies, positive communication skills, and enthusiastic engagement in learning can significantly impact student behavior and attitudes.
2. Highlight Behavioral Consequences: Clearly communicate the consequences of both positive and negative behaviors. Discussing the rewards of positive behaviors, such as academic achievement, collaboration, and effort, can motivate students to adopt desirable conduct.
3. Utilize Modeling Effectively: Employ modeling as a powerful teaching tool for new behaviors and skills. Ensure the four essential conditions for effective modeling are in place: attention, retention, production, and motivation.
4. Prioritize Modeling Over Shaping: In many cases, modeling is a more efficient and faster way to teach new knowledge and skills compared to shaping, an operant conditioning strategy that relies on gradual reinforcement.
5. Be a Positive Role Model: Teachers must consciously model appropriate behaviors and avoid modeling inappropriate ones. Students are constantly observing and learning from their teachers’ actions.
6. Expose Students to Diverse Models: Introduce students to a variety of models, including peers, older students, and adults from diverse backgrounds. This helps break down stereotypes and broaden students’ perspectives.
7. Model Cognitive Processes: Modeling should not be limited to observable behaviors. Teachers can also model thinking processes, problem-solving strategies, and attitudes towards learning. Verbalizing thought processes while working through problems can be particularly beneficial.
8. Foster Self-Efficacy: Help students develop a strong sense of self-efficacy by providing opportunities for success, offering confidence-building messages, and showcasing successful peer models. Ensure students believe in their ability to accomplish tasks.
9. Set Realistic Expectations: Help students set realistic yet challenging expectations. Ensure tasks are appropriately challenging, providing support and scaffolding as needed to facilitate success.
10. Teach Self-Regulation Techniques: Equip students with self-regulation strategies to improve their behavior and learning. Teach goal-setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reinforcement techniques.

Criticisms and Limitations of Social Cognitive Theory

Image 8: A teenager engrossed in a smartphone, illustrating the complexity of social learning in the digital age and potential criticisms of social cognitive theory.

Despite its significant contributions and widespread applications, social cognitive theory has faced certain criticisms and limitations:

1. Lack of Unified Theory: Some critics argue that SCT is not a fully unified theory. The connections between different aspects, such as observational learning and self-efficacy, are not always clearly defined or empirically demonstrated.
2. Overly Broad and Complex: The theory’s breadth and complexity can be seen as a limitation. Not all components are fully understood or integrated into a single, cohesive explanation of learning. Some findings associated with SCT are still considered preliminary.
3. Difficulty in Direct Observation: Not all social learning can be directly observed or easily quantified. This makes it challenging to precisely measure the impact of social cognition on development and behavior. Internal cognitive processes are difficult to observe directly, relying on inferences.
4. Limited Attention to Maturation: SCT tends to downplay the role of maturation and developmental stages across the lifespan. The theory does not fully differentiate between how children and adults learn through observation, potentially overlooking developmental factors that may influence learning processes at different ages.

Despite these criticisms, social cognitive theory remains a highly influential and valuable framework for understanding human learning and behavior, particularly in social and educational contexts. Its emphasis on observation, cognition, and social interaction has significantly advanced our understanding of how learning occurs and how we can create more effective learning environments.

Conclusion: Empowering Learners Through Social Cognitive Principles

Social cognitive theory offers a powerful lens through which to understand human learning, emphasizing the dynamic interplay of personal, behavioral, and environmental factors. By recognizing the importance of observational learning, self-efficacy, and self-regulation, educators can create more effective and engaging learning experiences for students. Applying SCT principles in the classroom empowers students to become active learners, develop strong self-beliefs, and achieve their full potential. As we continue to explore the complexities of human learning, social cognitive theory remains a cornerstone framework, guiding research and practice in education and beyond.

References

Ahmed, A. (2009, July). Effect of breastfeeding educational program based of Bandura social cognitive theory on breastfeeding outcomes among mothers of preterm infants. Poster presented at the ILCA Conference, Orlando, FL.

Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50(7-8), 505-514. Page 29

Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought & action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational application of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275–302. doi:10.1177/031289628801300210

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. Preventing AIDS, 25-59.

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164.

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180.

Bandura, A. (2011). The social and policy impact of social cognitive theory. In M. Mark, S. Donaldson, & B. Campbell (Eds.), Social psychology and evaluation (pp. 33-70). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). A comparative test of the status envy, social power, and secondary reinforcement the ries of identificatory learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 527-534.

Evans, R. I., & Bandura, A. (1989). Albert Bandura, the man and his ideas: A dialogue. New York, NY: Praeger.

Green, M., & Peil, J. A. (2009). Theories of human development: A comparative approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

Hardin, M., & Greer, J. D. (2009). The influence of gender-role socialization, media use and sports participation on perceptions of gender-appropriate sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32(2), 207-226.

Lent, R., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994, August). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.

Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Kanouse, D. E., Elliott, M., & Berry, S. H. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 914.

Mastro, D. E, & Stern, S. R. (2003). Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of prime-time advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(4), 638-647.

McAlister, A. L., Perry, C. L., & Parcel, G. S. (2008). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 169-188). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miller, K. (2005). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Nabi, R. L., & Clark, S. (2008). Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 407-427.

Ormrod, J. (2008). Human learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., & Nabi, R. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In R. L. Nabi, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 283-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Raman, P., Harwood, J., Weis, D., Anderson, J. L., & Miller, G. (2008). Portrayals of older adults in US and Indian magazine advertisements: A cross-cultural comparison. The Howard Journal of Communications, 19(3), 221-240.

Santrock, J. W. (2008). A topical approach to lifespan development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc. Self-efficacy theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Self-efficacy_theory

Films

Social Cognitive Theory by youtube. Public Domain

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory by youtube. Public Domain

Additional Reading

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1989AP.pdf

Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Retrieved from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Bandura1989ACD.pdf

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-81). New York, NY: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1994EHB.pdf

Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin, & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality, (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1999HP.pdf

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/BanduraPubs/Bandura1991OBHDP.pdf

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Journal of Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269-290. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura2002AP.pdf

Beck, H. P. (2001). Social learning theory. Retrieved from http://www1.appstate.edu/~beckhp/aggsociallearning.htm

Boeree, C. (2009). Personality theories: Albert Bandura. Retrieved from http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/bandura.html

Green, C. (1999). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Bandura/bobo.htm

McLeod, S. (2016). Bandura: Social learning theory. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html

Moore, A. (1999). Albert Bandura. Retrieved from http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/bandura.htm

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.htm

Social learning theory. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/nau.edu/educationallearningtheories/home/social-learning-thoery

Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Grusec, J. E. (1992). Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 776-786.

Ponton, M. K., & Rhea, N. E. (2006). Autonomous learning from social cognitive perspective. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 20(2), 38-49.

Books in Dalton State College Library

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1959). Adolescent aggression: A study of the influence of child-training practices and family interrelationships . New York, NY: Ronald Press Co.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Videos and Tutorials

Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmBqwWlJg8U

Films Media Group. (2003). Bandura’s social cognitive theory: An introduction. Retrieved from Films on Demand database.