The concept of “learning styles”—the idea that individuals learn best when information is presented in a specific format (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.)—has been a popular topic in education for decades. But is there any scientific truth to it? This article delves into the research surrounding learning styles and explores whether catering to specific learning preferences truly enhances learning outcomes.
The Appeal and the Problem with Learning Styles
The idea of learning styles is inherently appealing. It offers a seemingly simple framework for understanding individual differences in learning and suggests personalized teaching strategies. Educators and students alike are drawn to the notion that tailoring instruction to individual preferences can unlock learning potential. However, the widespread acceptance of learning styles contrasts sharply with the lack of empirical evidence supporting its efficacy.
Defining Learning Styles and Their Core Assumptions
Learning styles theory posits that individuals possess inherent preferences for receiving and processing information. These preferences are often categorized into modalities such as visual (learning through seeing), auditory (learning through hearing), and kinesthetic (learning through doing). The theory rests on two fundamental assumptions:
- Measurable and Consistent Styles: Individuals have a consistent and identifiable learning style that can be measured.
- Improved Outcomes through Matching: Teaching to a student’s preferred learning style leads to improved educational outcomes.
The Evidence Against Learning Styles
Despite the popularity of learning styles, numerous studies have failed to validate these core assumptions.
Measurement Challenges and Inconsistent Findings
Over 50 different learning style models exist, making consistent measurement difficult. Most assessments rely on self-reporting, which can be unreliable as individuals are often poor judges of their own learning processes. Furthermore, studies have shown that learner preferences can change over time and vary depending on the subject matter, challenging the notion of stable and consistent learning styles. 
Woman and man looking at a digital tablet
Lack of Impact on Learning Outcomes
Crucially, research consistently demonstrates that teaching to a student’s self-identified learning style does not lead to improved learning outcomes. Studies have found no significant difference in performance between students taught according to their preferred style and those taught using other methods. Some research even suggests that students may perform better when taught in a modality different from their self-reported preference.
Alternative Explanations for Learning Differences
If learning styles don’t hold up to scrutiny, what accounts for the observed differences in how individuals learn? One plausible explanation is the multi-modal learning approach. This approach emphasizes engaging learners through various modalities, not to cater to specific styles, but to enhance attention and promote deeper processing of information. Presenting information in multiple formats can make learning more engaging and encourages students to integrate knowledge in new ways. This aligns with research showing that dual-coding (presenting information visually and verbally) can improve learning outcomes.
The Potential Harm of the Learning Styles Myth
While the intention behind learning styles is positive, perpetuating this myth can have negative consequences. It can lead to:
- Oversimplification of Learning: Reducing the complexities of learning to simple categories ignores the multifaceted cognitive processes involved.
- Limited Learning Opportunities: Focusing solely on a perceived “best” way to learn can restrict students’ exposure to diverse learning experiences.
- Fixed Mindset: Labeling students as specific learners can foster a fixed mindset, leading them to believe their learning abilities are predetermined and inflexible.
Rethinking Learning: Focus on Effective Strategies, Not Styles
Instead of focusing on learning styles, educators should prioritize evidence-based teaching strategies that promote active learning, critical thinking, and metacognition. These strategies include:
- Active Recall: Encouraging students to retrieve information from memory.
- Spaced Repetition: Reviewing material at increasing intervals.
- Elaboration: Connecting new information to existing knowledge.
- Dual Coding: Presenting information both visually and verbally.
- Interleaving: Mixing different concepts and topics during learning.
Conclusion
The notion of visual learning, like other specific learning styles, is largely a myth. While individuals may have preferences for how they learn, catering to these preferences does not guarantee improved learning outcomes. Educators should focus on implementing evidence-based teaching strategies that promote active engagement and deep processing of information, rather than relying on the unsubstantiated claims of learning styles theory. Learning is a complex and dynamic process that requires active participation and flexible approaches, not adherence to rigid categories.
References
- Alley, S., et al. (2023). Does matching a personally tailored physical activity intervention to participants’ learning style improve intervention effectiveness and engagement? Journal of Health Psychology, 28(10), 889–899.
- Coffield, F., et al. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice: Learning & Skills Research Center.
- Cuevas, J. (2015). Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles. Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 308–333.
- Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171.
- Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183.
- Krätzig, G. P., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 238–246.
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
- Pashler, H., et al. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
- Rogowsky, B. A., et al. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78.
- Rogowsky, B. A., et al. (2020). Providing Instruction Based on Students’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
