The rapid shift to online learning, accelerated by global events like the COVID-19 pandemic, has presented both opportunities and challenges for educators and students alike. While online platforms offer flexibility and accessibility, one critical aspect often diminished in the digital transition is the depth and quality of teacher-student interaction. This article delves into the impact of limited teacher-student interaction on online learning effectiveness, drawing insights from recent research and exploring strategies to foster more engaging virtual educational environments.
The Critical Role of Teacher-Student Interaction in Education
Decades of educational research underscore the vital role of teacher-student interaction in fostering effective learning. Traditional classroom settings inherently facilitate dynamic exchanges, allowing for immediate feedback, personalized guidance, and the development of strong student-teacher relationships. These interactions extend beyond mere information delivery; they contribute to a positive psychological atmosphere, boost student engagement, and ultimately enhance learning outcomes. Interaction theory posits that learning is a social process, deeply influenced by the quality and nature of interactions within the learning environment. Effective teacher-student interaction in any context is characterized by varied forms, content, and levels, leveraging the unique strengths of both teachers and students to create a rich educational experience.
Figure 1. Conceptual model illustrating the influence of teacher-student interaction on learning effectiveness in online education, highlighting mediating factors.
The Challenge of Limited Interaction in Online Environments
The shift to online learning, while necessary and often beneficial, can inadvertently reduce opportunities for robust teacher-student interaction. Several factors contribute to this limitation:
- Asynchronous Communication: Many online courses rely heavily on asynchronous tools like discussion boards and pre-recorded lectures. While these are convenient, they lack the spontaneity and immediate feedback of face-to-face interactions.
- Technological Barriers: Technical issues, lack of digital literacy, or unreliable internet access can hinder seamless communication and interaction in online settings.
- Reduced Non-Verbal Cues: Online communication often strips away non-verbal cues, such as body language and facial expressions, which are crucial for understanding and responding effectively in interactions.
- Design of Online Courses: Poorly designed online courses may not prioritize or effectively integrate interactive elements, focusing instead on passive content delivery.
- Teacher Workload and Training: Educators may face increased workloads in adapting to online teaching, and may not have adequate training in fostering online interaction, leading to less engagement with students.
These limitations can result in students feeling isolated, less motivated, and struggling to connect with the course material and their instructors. The absence of strong teacher-student interaction can negatively impact the psychological atmosphere of the online classroom and reduce student learning engagement, ultimately affecting learning outcomes.
Empirical Evidence: Interaction Level and Learning Effects
Research has consistently shown a strong positive correlation between the level of teacher-student interaction and learning effects in online education. A study involving 398 university students in China investigated this relationship using a questionnaire survey. The findings robustly supported the hypothesis that higher levels of teacher-student interaction are associated with improved learning outcomes. This study, employing a serial mediating model, went further to explore the mechanisms through which interaction impacts learning.
The research identified key mediating factors: psychological atmosphere and learning engagement. A positive psychological atmosphere in the online classroom, fostered by effective teacher-student interaction, creates a supportive and encouraging environment. This, in turn, boosts student learning engagement – their active participation, investment, and enthusiasm for the learning process. The study revealed that teacher-student interaction not only directly enhances learning effects but also indirectly improves them by creating a positive psychological atmosphere and fostering greater learning engagement.
Demographic characteristics of students participating in online learning research
Table 1. Breakdown of participant demographics in a study examining online learning and teacher-student interaction.
Strategies to Enhance Teacher-Student Interaction in Online Learning
Recognizing the critical link between interaction and learning outcomes, educators can implement various strategies to mitigate the limitations of online environments and foster more meaningful teacher-student connections:
- Promote Synchronous Interaction: Integrate live sessions, video conferencing, and real-time chat into online courses. These tools allow for immediate question-and-answer sessions, live discussions, and a sense of community.
- Utilize Interactive Technologies: Employ online tools that encourage active participation, such as collaborative documents, virtual whiteboards, polling software, and gamified learning platforms.
- Foster a Sense of Presence: Instructors can enhance their online “presence” by regularly engaging in discussion forums, providing timely and personalized feedback, using video and audio messages, and creating a welcoming and approachable online persona.
- Design for Interaction: Structure online courses to intentionally incorporate interactive activities, group projects, peer-to-peer learning opportunities, and regular opportunities for students to connect with the instructor.
- Provide Clear Communication Channels: Establish clear and accessible channels for students to communicate with the instructor, whether through email, dedicated messaging platforms, or virtual office hours.
- Offer Personalized Support: Recognize that students have diverse needs and learning styles. Provide personalized support, guidance, and feedback to cater to individual student requirements and build stronger relationships.
- Train Educators in Online Interaction Techniques: Provide professional development for educators focused on strategies for fostering online interaction, utilizing technology effectively, and creating engaging virtual learning environments.
By consciously implementing these strategies, educators can actively combat the limitations of reduced interaction in online learning and create more dynamic, engaging, and effective virtual classrooms.
The Broader Implications: Building a New Teacher-Student Relationship Online
Enhancing teacher-student interaction in online learning is not simply about replicating traditional classroom dynamics in a digital space. It’s about reimagining and evolving the teacher-student relationship for the online context. This involves:
- Embracing Technology for Connection: Leveraging technology not just for content delivery, but as a tool to build stronger connections and facilitate meaningful interactions.
- Focusing on Relational Aspects: Recognizing the importance of emotional and social connections in learning, and prioritizing the development of trust and rapport between teachers and students online.
- Creating a Collaborative Learning Community: Building online classrooms that are not just spaces for instruction, but vibrant learning communities where students and teachers learn from and support each other.
By focusing on these broader implications, educators can move beyond simply mitigating the limitations of online learning and instead harness the potential of digital environments to create new and innovative forms of teacher-student interaction that enhance the learning experience for all.
Conclusion: Prioritizing Interaction for Effective Online Education
In conclusion, while online learning offers numerous advantages, the challenge of limited teacher-student interaction must be actively addressed to ensure effective educational outcomes. Research clearly demonstrates the crucial role of interaction in fostering a positive psychological atmosphere, boosting learning engagement, and ultimately enhancing student learning effects. By implementing deliberate strategies to promote both synchronous and asynchronous interaction, leveraging interactive technologies, and focusing on building strong online teacher-student relationships, educators can overcome these limitations. Prioritizing interaction is not just about improving online learning – it’s about creating a future of education that is both accessible and deeply engaging, fostering a new era of effective and connected learning experiences for all students.
References
Allen, D. G., and Griffeth, R. W. (2001). Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 1014–1021. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1014
Ames, C., and Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. J. Educ. Psychol. 80, 260–267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
Bandura, A. (1967). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carter, L. M., and Rukholm, E. (2008). A study of critical thinking, teacher-student interaction, and discipline-specific writing in an online educational setting for registered nurses. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 39, 133–138. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20080301-03
Chen, T., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., Yang, J., and Cong, G. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare 8:200. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030200
Debourgh, G. A. (2003). Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most? J. Prof. Nurs. 19, 149–163. doi: 10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00072-3
Graesser, A. C., and Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. J. Educ. Psychol. 95, 524–536. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524
He, K. K. (1997). The teaching mode, teaching method, and teaching design of constructivism. J. Beijing Nor. Uni. 5, 74–81.
Jiang, Y. J., Bai, X. M., Wu, W. C., and Luo, X. J. (2019). Analysis of the structural relationship of influencing factors of the online learning experience. Mod. Distance Educ. 1, 27–36. doi: 10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2019.0004
Li, X. W., Ye, W. J., and Zhang, Q. H. (2020). Research on the index model of teacher-student interaction behavior in the environment of “internet+teaching”. Res. High. Educ. Eng. 3, 157–162.
Lin, C. H., Zheng, B., and Zhang, Y. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 48, 730–748. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12457
Liu, X. (2006). On the principles of teacher-student interaction in distance education from the perspective of dialogue theory. Distance Educ. China 3, 37–39.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. Am. J. Dist. Educ. 2, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., and Galyen, K. (2010). Designing for E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 2, 129–135.
Mu, S., and Wang, X. J. (2019). Research on deep learning strategies in online learning. Distance Educ. China 10, 29–39+93.
Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: benefits, challenges, and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 3, 70–85. doi: 10.46328/ijonse.32
Pennings, H. J., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C., van der Want, A. C., and van Tartwijk, J. (2018). Interpersonal adaptation in teacher-student interaction. Learn. Instr. 55, 41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.005
Pham, G., Koch, T., Helmke, A., Schrader, F., Helmke, T., and Eid, M. (2012). Do teachers know how their teaching is perceived by their pupils? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 3368–3374. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.068
Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation model. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Seabi, J. (2012). Feuerstein’s mediated learning experience as a vehicle for enhancing cognitive functioning of remedial school learners. Aust. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 12, 35–45.
Shi, F. H. (2010). A new perspective on quality evaluation reform of undergraduate education: learning engagement. Mod. Educ. Manag. 5, 51–54. [in Chinese]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5485.2010.05.015
Tang, C. L. (2018). The relationship between perceived school climate and learning engagement in junior middle school students and intervention study. Doctoral dissertation. Central China Normal University. [in Chinese].
Tang, S. G., and Zhong, W. L. (2013). Research on the construction of interactive teaching model. Theory Pract. Educ. 18, 42–43.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 271–296. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Wang, Z., Bergin, C., and Bergin, D. A. (2014). Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: the classroom engagement inventory. Sch. Psychol. Q. 29, 517–535. doi: 10.1037/spq0000050
Wilson, T. D. (2006). On user studies and information needs. J. Doc. 62, 658–670. doi: 10.1108/00220410610714895
Xu, E. Q. (2016). An empirical study on the impact of teacher-students interaction on online learning performance. Res. Audio-Vis. Educ. 37, 61–68. doi: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2016.09.010
Yang, K. C. (2002). Several issues concerning the development of instructional design theory in the internet age. Mod. Educ. Technol. 1, 20–23+76.
Yu, H. Q., Li, C., and Shi, M. M. (2013). The influence of learning environment on college students’ learning style and academic achievement: an empirical study based on the cultivation of undergraduate top innovative talents. J. High. Educ. 8, 62–70.
Yuan, Y. R., and Qi, S. J. (2020). A study on the influencing factors of college students’ learning ability in online teaching environment. Educ. Rev. 8, 61–64.
Zhang, Z. P. (2015). Research on teacher-student interaction in foreign classrooms: hot issues and future trends. Pri. Seco. Sch. Abr. 4, 42–48+41.
Zhang, W. P., Chen, M. T., Zhao, X. N., and Bai, X. (2020). Influence of teacher-student interaction on classroom learning in special delivery classroom: a case of art delivery class in chongyang primary school. Res. Audio-Vis. Educ. 41, 90–96. doi: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2020.08.012
Zhang, X. L., Huang, Z. Z., and Li, M. L. (2017). An empirical study of online learners’ “interactive learning” experience and its impact on learning outcomes. Tsinghua J. Educ. 2, 117–124.
Zhou, Q. F. (2003). Constructing a language classroom of “teacher-student interaction”. Doctoral dissertation. East China Normal University.
Zhou, X. C. (2018). Exploration of assessment system and rating scales based on the blended learning mode. J. Chengdu Nor. Uni. 37, 163–167.
