The concept of certain Pokémon types having near-universal access to moves of a specific type often sparks debate among players. One common misconception is that Aggron, a Steel/Rock-type Pokémon, can learn Surf. This article clarifies why Aggron can’t learn Surf and delves into the broader issue of overly accessible coverage moves in the Pokémon games.
Why Aggron Can’t Learn Surf: Type Compatibility
Surf is a Water-type move. Aggron, being a Steel/Rock type, has no natural affinity for Water-type moves. Steel types are resistant to Water, and Rock types are neutral. This inherent type incompatibility prevents Aggron from learning Surf through traditional methods like leveling up or TMs. While some Pokémon can learn moves outside their typical type through special means, Aggron has never been given such an exception for Surf. Its movepool focuses primarily on physical attacks utilizing its Steel and Rock typing.
The Problem with Universal Coverage Moves
The question of Aggron learning Surf touches upon a larger issue within the Pokémon games: the overabundance of coverage moves for certain types. Many argue that Water types shouldn’t have almost universal access to Ice-type moves, just as Ground types shouldn’t readily learn Rock moves, and vice versa. This widespread accessibility blurs the lines between types and diminishes strategic depth.
For example, the supposed advantage Flying types hold over Ground types, and Grass types over Water types, is significantly weakened when these type matchups are easily circumvented by readily available coverage moves. This imbalance negatively impacts competitive gameplay. While dual-typed Pokémon learning moves of both their types makes sense, extending this logic to all Pokémon based on superficial connections (“rocks are on the ground”) undermines the strategic nuances of type matchups.
Logical Inconsistencies in Movepools
The logic behind certain coverage moves often falls apart upon closer examination. Why should every Pokémon with fangs learn elemental fang moves of every type? Similarly, should every Pokémon with a fist be able to learn elemental punch moves? These examples highlight the disconnect between a Pokémon’s physical characteristics and its ability to manipulate elemental forces.
Just because a Water-type Pokémon is associated with water doesn’t inherently grant it the ability to manipulate ice. Similarly, Ground types aren’t automatically capable of manipulating magma or lava simply because they are associated with the ground. These moves should be reserved for Pokémon specifically designed around those dualities. A more logical approach would prioritize moves that align with a Pokémon’s design and lore rather than relying on arbitrary physical attributes.
The Impact on Game Balance
The prevalence of coverage moves, particularly Water types learning Ice moves, significantly impacts game balance. The classic Fire-Water-Grass starter triangle is disrupted when Water types consistently possess an advantage over Grass types due to Ice-type moves. This dynamic undermines the intended cyclical relationship and diminishes the strategic importance of type matchups. In a fast-paced metagame where one-hit knockouts (OHKOs) are common, the “weakness” to slower Grass types becomes almost negligible when Water types can readily utilize powerful Ice-type attacks.
Conclusion: Balancing Accessibility and Strategic Depth
The debate surrounding Aggron learning Surf and the broader issue of coverage move accessibility underscores the need for balance in Pokémon game design. While accessibility is important, maintaining the strategic significance of type matchups is crucial for preserving the competitive integrity of the games. A more thoughtful approach to movepool distribution, prioritizing logical consistency and strategic depth, would enhance the overall gameplay experience.
