Paula Vogel’s “How I Learned to Drive” is not your typical coming-of-age story. The play tackles complex themes of sexual abuse and trauma through a non-linear narrative structure and innovative theatrical techniques. This monologue delves into the play’s form and how it contributes to its powerful message, drawing upon critical analyses by scholars like Sarah Lansdale Stevenson and Andrew Kimbrough.
Deconstructing the Narrative: Time, Memory, and Voice in “How I Learned to Drive”
Vogel masterfully disrupts conventional theatrical forms to convey the fragmented nature of trauma. The play’s non-chronological structure mirrors the disjointed memories and psychological impact of abuse on the protagonist, Li’l Bit. This disruption extends to the body image, as highlighted by Stevenson, with Li’l Bit’s experience of dissociation from her physical self serving as a central motif.
The play’s title, “How I Learned to Drive,” takes on a metaphorical meaning, representing Li’l Bit’s journey of navigating complex relationships and trauma.
The Power of Polyphony: Multiple Voices and Perspectives
“How I Learned to Drive” employs a Bakhtinian polyphony, incorporating multiple voices and perspectives that challenge simplistic interpretations. The Greek Chorus, the fragmented representations of Li’l Bit at different ages, and the contrasting viewpoints of characters like Aunt Mary create a complex tapestry of experiences. This multiplicity, as highlighted by Kimbrough, prevents the audience from readily assigning labels of “good” or “bad,” forcing a deeper engagement with the characters’ moral ambiguities.
Brechtian Techniques and Theatrical Devices: Distancing for Deeper Understanding
Vogel utilizes Brechtian techniques to distance the audience emotionally, encouraging critical reflection rather than passive empathy. The use of minimal stage signifiers, the casting of actors in multiple roles, and the juxtaposition of realistic scenes with stylized, comedic interludes disrupt the illusion of reality. This alienation effect, as noted by Kimbrough, enhances the play’s intellectual impact.
The Greek Chorus provides commentary and different perspectives on the unfolding events, contributing to the play’s polyphonic structure.
Genre Bending: Tragedy, Comedy, and the Search for Meaning
The play seamlessly blends elements of tragedy, comedy, memory play, and even mystery, creating a unique theatrical experience. This genre blending, coupled with the polyphonic structure, contributes to the play’s overall complexity and its resistance to easy categorization. The audience is challenged to grapple with the uncomfortable realities of abuse while simultaneously acknowledging the moments of humor and resilience.
A Play as Powerful as its Form: The Enduring Legacy of “How I Learned to Drive”
“How I Learned to Drive” is a testament to the power of innovative theatrical form in conveying complex themes. Vogel’s masterful use of non-linear narrative, polyphony, Brechtian techniques, and genre blending creates a deeply impactful and thought-provoking experience for the audience. The play’s enduring legacy lies in its ability to spark dialogue and challenge conventional understandings of trauma and recovery.
References
-
Burton, S. (1996). Bakhtin, temporality, and modern narrative: Writing ‘the whole triumphant murderous unstoppable chute’. Comparative Literature, 48(1), 39-64.
-
Kimbrough, A. (2007). Formal Subversion in How I Learned to Drive: A Structure of Meaning. Text & Presentation: The Comparative Drama Conference Series Supplement, 4, 93-108.
-
Stevenson, S. L. (2001). Yielding to Multiplicity: The Kaleidoscopic Subject of Paula Vogel’s How I Learned to Drive (1997). In Women Making Art: Women in the Visual, Literary, and Performing Arts since 1960. Eruptions: New Thinking Across the Disciplines, 7, 244.
-
Vogel, P. (1998). How I Learned to Drive. In The Mammary Plays. New York: Theatre Communications Group.
Paula Vogel, the Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright of “How I Learned to Drive,” is known for her bold and innovative theatrical works.
