Non-Associative Learning: Unveiling Habituation Mechanisms Using Zebrafish Models

Introduction to Non-Associative Learning

Non-associative learning represents a fundamental form of learning where an organism modifies its response to a single type of stimulus after repeated exposure, without associating it with another stimulus or event. This type of learning is crucial for animals to adapt to their environment, allowing them to filter out irrelevant and repetitive stimuli and focus on novel or significant changes. Two primary forms of non-associative learning are habituation and sensitization. Habituation is characterized by a decrease in response to a repeated stimulus, while sensitization involves an increased response to a stimulus following exposure to an intense or noxious stimulus. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying non-associative learning is vital for comprehending the basic principles of behavioral adaptation and cognitive function.

Zebrafish ( Danio rerio) have emerged as a powerful model organism in biological research, particularly in neuroscience and behavioral studies. Their genetic tractability, transparent larvae, and complex behaviors make them ideal for investigating the neural circuits and molecular pathways involved in learning and memory. Specifically, the larval zebrafish’s acoustic startle response (ASR), a reflexive escape behavior triggered by a sudden loud sound, provides a robust and quantifiable system to study habituation, a key aspect of non-associative learning. This article explores how the zebrafish ASR model is used to dissect the mechanisms of habituation and how pharmacological agents can modulate this process, offering insights into the broader understanding of non-associative learning.

Habituation of the Acoustic Startle Response in Zebrafish Larvae

To determine if zebrafish larvae exhibit genuine habituation, researchers have applied several established criteria (Thompson and Spencer, 1966; Brown, 1998). Initial studies focused on the ASR of zebrafish larvae in response to repeated acoustic stimuli. It was confirmed that zebrafish larvae, from as early as 5 days post-fertilization (dpf), are capable of responding to acoustic stimuli (Bang et al, 2002; Zeddies and Fay, 2005). For experimental consistency, a 200 Hz sound stimulus at 113 dB was found to elicit an optimal and measurable startle response in zebrafish larvae. While the response may involve both auditory and proprioceptive pathways, for the purpose of studying habituation in this context, both are considered components of the ASR.

Depiction of zebrafish larvae exhibiting a startle response to an acoustic stimulus, illustrating the model system for studying non-associative learning.

Experiments were conducted using different zebrafish strains, WIK and AB, to assess their baseline responsiveness to sound. Quantitative analysis of various parameters, including distance moved, revealed that the WIK strain showed a more pronounced response to sound compared to the AB strain. Further investigation into the age-dependent response in WIK strain zebrafish indicated that 7 dpf larvae consistently exhibited a robust and reliable ASR, making them an ideal age group for habituation studies.

The key question was whether the observed reduction in startle response with repeated sound stimuli in zebrafish larvae truly represented habituation. Several tests were performed to validate this. First, recovery of responsiveness was examined. After habituation to a series of tones, a 15-minute interval was sufficient for the zebrafish larvae to regain their initial startle response to a subsequent set of tones. Intriguingly, an enhanced response to the second group of tones was observed, suggesting a potentiation effect, potentially due to increased alertness (Kandel and Spencer, 1968; Groves and Thompson, 1970; Brown, 1998). This recovery of response is a hallmark of habituation and distinguishes it from sensory adaptation or motor fatigue.

The effect of stimulus frequency was also investigated by varying the inter-trial intervals (ITIs). Shorter ITIs (1 second) led to more rapid habituation compared to longer ITIs. This finding aligns with the established principle of habituation that higher frequency stimulation results in faster habituation (Thompson and Spencer, 1966).

Dishabituation, another critical criterion for habituation, was also tested. Dishabituation is the restoration of a habituated response by the introduction of a novel, often startling, stimulus. In this experiment, a light pulse, mimicking the shadow of a predator, was interspersed between the auditory tones during the 5-second ITI. The light pulse successfully re-initiated the startle response to the subsequent tones in habituated larvae. This confirmed that the reduction in ASR was not due to motor exhaustion but rather a genuine habituation process. The zebrafish larvae’s behavioral responses to repeated auditory cues thus fulfill several key criteria for habituation, demonstrating that they are a valid model for studying this form of non-associative learning.

Pharmacological Modulation of Habituation: Insights into Learning Mechanisms

Having established zebrafish larvae as a model for habituation, researchers investigated the pharmacological modulation of this non-associative learning process. They tested several compounds known to influence learning and memory in mammals, including rolipram, donepezil, and memantine.

Rolipram, a phosphodiesterase type IV (PDE IV) inhibitor, has been shown to enhance learning and memory in rodent models (Imanishi et al, 1997; Barad et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 2000; Zhang and O’Donnell, 2000). In zebrafish larvae, rolipram exposure (particularly at 3 μM for 24 hours) resulted in an increased distance moved in response to the acoustic stimulus, indicating an enhanced startle response. This finding mirrors the effects of rolipram in rats, where it increases the amplitude of the ASR (Kehne et al, 1991). The results suggest the presence of functional PDE IV enzymes or high-affinity rolipram binding sites in the zebrafish brain, although further studies with selective PDE IV inhibitors are needed for confirmation.

Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat Alzheimer’s disease (Sugimoto et al, 2002), and memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist also used in Alzheimer’s therapy (Parsons et al, 1999), were also tested. Both drugs, known to improve cognitive function in Alzheimer’s patients (Burns et al, 1999; Winblad et al, 2001, 2006; Peskind et al, 2006; Takeda et al, 2006), also increased the distance moved in response to sound in zebrafish larvae, similar to rolipram.

Graphical representation of pharmacological modulation of the acoustic startle response in zebrafish, illustrating the effects of rolipram, donepezil, and memantine.

The effect of memantine was further confirmed to be NMDA receptor-mediated, as co-administration with the NMDA agonist abrogated the potentiating effect of memantine alone. Interestingly, memantine’s effect on habituation differed in time course compared to rolipram and donepezil, exhibiting a smaller but more prolonged potentiation of the ASR. While NMDA receptor antagonists like dizocilpine (MK-801) have been shown to induce amnesia in goldfish in active-avoidance learning paradigms (Xu et al, 1998), dizocilpine did not impair avoidance retention in zebrafish in a different context (Xu et al, 2007). In the context of habituation, memantine’s reduction of habituation could be due to impaired “forgetting” of the stimulus or simply increased alertness. Consistent with these findings, dizocilpine has also been shown to enhance the startle response in mice (Klamer et al, 2004), supporting a conserved role for NMDA receptors in modulating habituation across species.

Zebrafish possess the genes for NMDA receptor subunits, similar to mammals (Cox et al, 2005; Ishii et al, 1993), and the effects of memantine likely involve NMDAR1 subunits, although further research with subunit-specific agonists and antagonists is needed to pinpoint the exact subtypes involved in modulating habituation in zebrafish.

Cholinergic systems, both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, are also known to play a role in learning and memory in both zebrafish and mammals (Levin and Simon, 1998; Power et al, 2003; Levin et al, 2006a). Donepezil’s effect on enhancing the startle response and decreasing habituation in zebrafish larvae was investigated in the context of cholinergic receptors. Combining donepezil with mecamylamine (nicotinic antagonist) or atropine (muscarinic antagonist) revealed that mecamylamine completely abolished donepezil’s effects, while atropine did not. In fact, atropine alone had an inhibitory effect on the ASR, and surprisingly, seemed to potentiate donepezil’s effects further. This suggests that donepezil’s modulation of habituation in zebrafish larvae is primarily mediated through nicotinic receptors, consistent with previous findings on nicotine’s cognitive-enhancing effects in adult zebrafish (Levin et al, 2006a; Levin and Chen, 2004; Levin et al, 2006b). Zebrafish larvae possess functional acetylcholinesterase and express nicotinic and muscarinic receptor subunits (Svoboda et al, 2002; Zirger et al, 2003; Williams and Messer, 2004), further supporting their utility in studying cholinergic modulation of learning.

Zebrafish Larvae: A High-Throughput Model for Studying Non-Associative Learning and Drug Discovery

The need for efficient and reliable behavioral models, especially those amenable to high-throughput screening, is growing, particularly in the field of cognitive disorders and drug discovery. Mammalian models, while valuable, often require significant resources in terms of compound usage, animal numbers, and time. Zebrafish larvae offer a compelling alternative due to their small size, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for high-throughput assays using multi-well plate formats.

Illustration of high-throughput screening using zebrafish larvae in multi-well plates, highlighting the efficiency of the model for drug discovery related to non-associative learning.

While adult zebrafish models exist for learning and memory studies, often adapting rodent tests to an aquatic environment (Williams et al, 2002; Carvan et al, 2004; Swain et al, 2004; Levin et al, 2006a), their size and housing requirements limit their use in truly high-throughput screens. Adult zebrafish are around 2.5 cm long and typically require 1-2 liters of water per fish. In contrast, larval zebrafish, only a few millimeters in length, can be maintained in 96-well plates, enabling rapid and efficient screening of large compound libraries.

The demonstration that zebrafish larvae exhibit habituation of the ASR, a form of non-associative learning, and that this process can be pharmacologically modulated in ways consistent with mammalian models, positions them as a valuable tool for studying learning and memory. The enhancing effects of rolipram, donepezil, and memantine on the ASR (manifested as decreased habituation) suggest that these compounds may increase alertness or awareness in the fish. However, it’s important to note that in some contexts, such as in schizophrenia research, enhanced startle response and reduced habituation are interpreted as reflecting cognitive deficits (Klamer et al, 2004; Meincke et al, 2004). Therefore, further research is crucial to fully understand the cognitive implications of ASR modulation in zebrafish and to refine the interpretation of these behavioral changes in the context of learning and memory.

Conclusion

In summary, this research validates the zebrafish larval ASR habituation assay as a robust and high-throughput model for studying non-associative learning. The findings demonstrate that zebrafish larvae exhibit genuine habituation to repeated acoustic stimuli, fulfilling established criteria for this learning process. Furthermore, the pharmacological modulation of habituation by compounds known to influence learning and memory in mammals highlights the conserved mechanisms underlying non-associative learning across species. This zebrafish model offers significant advantages for large-scale screening of compounds to identify novel therapeutic targets for cognitive enhancement and for dissecting the complex biochemical and receptor pathways involved in learning and memory. Ongoing research is aimed at elucidating the interactive effects of the pharmacological agents used in this study and further validating the zebrafish larval ASR habituation assay as a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of non-associative learning and its pharmacological modulation.

References

Bang PI, Yelick PC, Malicki JJ, Sewell WF (2002). High-throughput behavioral screening method for detecting auditory response defects in zebrafish. J Neurosci Methods 118: 177–187.
Barad M, Bourtchouladze R, Winder DG, Golan H, Kandel E (1998). Rolipram, a type IV-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, facilitates the establishment of long-lasting long-term potentiation and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15020–15025.
Brown GD (1998). Nonassociative learning processes affecting swimming probability in the seaslug Tritonia diomedea: habituation, sensitization and inhibition. Behav Brain Res 95: 151–165.
Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, Gauthier S, Petit H, Moller HJ et al (1999). The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease—results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 10: 237–244.
Carvan III MJ, Loucks E, Weber DN, Williams FE (2004). Ethanol effects on the developing zebrafish: neurobehavior and skeletal morphogenesis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 26: 757–768.
Cox JA, Kucenas S, Voigt MM (2005). Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of the family of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit genes in the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 234: 756–766.
Easter Jr SS, Nicola GN (1996). The development of vision in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev Biol 180: 646–663.
Goldsmith P (2004). Zebrafish as a pharmacological tool: the how, why and when. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4: 504–512.
Groves PM, Thompson RF (1970). Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol Rev 77: 419–450.
Imanishi T, Sawa A, Ichimaru Y, Miyashiro M, Kato S, Yamamoto T et al (1997). Ameliorating effects of rolipram on experimentally induced impairments of learning and memory in rodents. Eur J Pharmacol 321: 273–278.
Ishii T, Moriyoshi K, Sugihara H, Sakurada K, Kadotani H, Yokoi M et al (1993). Molecular characterization of the family of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. J Biol Chem 268: 2836–2843.
Kandel ER, Spencer WA (1968). Cellular neurophysiological approaches in the study of learning. Physiol Rev 48: 65–134.
Kehne JH, Boulis NM, Davis M (1991). Effects of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram on the acoustic startle response in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 105: 27–36.
Klamer D, Palsson E, Revesz A, Engel JA, Svensson L (2004). Habituation of acoustic startle is disrupted by psychotomimetic drugs: differential dependence on dopaminergic and nitric oxide modulatory mechanisms. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 176: 440–450.
Levin ED, Chen E (2004). Nicotinic involvement in memory function in zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol 26: 731–735.
Levin ED, Limpuangthip J, Rachakonda T, Peterson M (2006a). Timing of nicotine effects on learning in zebrafish. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 184: 547–552.
Levin ED, McClernon FJ, Rezvani AH (2006b). Nicotinic effects on cognitive function: behavioral characterization, pharmacological specification, and anatomic localization. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 184: 523–539.
Levin ED, Simon BB (1998). Nicotinic acetylcholine involvement in cognitive function in animals. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 138: 217–230.
Meincke U, Light GA, Geyer MA, Braff DL, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E (2004). Sensitization and habituation of the acoustic startle reflex in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 126: 51–61.
Parsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G (1999). Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist—a review of preclinical data. Neuropharmacology 38: 735–767.
Peskind ER, Potkin SG, Pomara N, Ott BR, Graham SM, Olin JT et al (2006). Memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a 24-week randomized, controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 704–715.
Power AE, Vazdarjanova A, McGaugh JL (2003). Muscarinic cholinergic influences in memory consolidation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80: 178–193.
Sugimoto H, Ogura H, Arai Y, Limura Y, Yamanishi Y (2002). Research and development of donepezil hydrochloride, a new type of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Jpn J Pharmacol 89: 7–20.
Swain HA, Sigstad C, Scalzo FM (2004). Effects of dizocilpine (MK-801) on circling behavior, swimming activity, and place preference in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurotoxicol Teratol 26: 725–729.
Svoboda KR, Vijayaraghavan S, Tanguay RL (2002). Nicotinic receptors mediate changes in spinal motoneuron development and axonal pathfinding in embryonic zebrafish exposed to nicotine. J Neurosci 22: 10731–10741.
Takeda A, Loveman E, Clegg A, Kirby J, Picot J, Payne E et al (2006). A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine on cognition, quality of life and adverse events in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21: 17–28.
Thompson RF, Spencer WA (1966). Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev 73: 16–43.
Williams FE, Messer Jr WS (2004). Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured by radioligand binding techniques. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 137: 349–353.
Williams FE, White D, Messer WS (2002). A simple spatial alternation task for assessing memory function in zebrafish. Behav Processes 58: 125–132.
Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, Verhey F, Waldemar G, Wimo A et al (2001). A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 57: 489–495.
Winblad B, Kilander L, Eriksson S, Minthon L, Batsman S, Wetterholm AL et al (2006). Donepezil in patients with severe Alzheimer’s disease: double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Lancet 367: 1057–1065.
Xu X, Boshoven W, Lombardo B, Spranger J (1998). Comparison of the amnestic effects of NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors: L-NAME and L-NOARG in goldfish. Behav Neurosci 112: 892–899.
Xu X, Scott-Scheiern T, Kempker L, Simons K (2007). Active avoidance conditioning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurobiol Learn Mem 87: 72–77.
Zeddies DG, Fay RR (2005). Development of the acoustically evoked behavioral response in zebrafish to pure tones. J Exp Biol 208: 1363–1372.
Zhang HT, Crissman AM, Dorairaj NR, Chandler LJ, O’Donnell JM (2000). Inhibition of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4) reverses memory deficits associated with NMDA receptor antagonism. Neuropsychopharmacology 23: 198–204.
Zhang HT, O’Donnell JM (2000). Effects of rolipram on scopolamine-induced impairment of working and reference memory in the radial-arm maze tests in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 150: 311–316.
Zirger JM, Beattie CE, McKay DB, Boyd RT (2003). Cloning and expression of zebrafish neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Gene Expr Patterns 3: 747–754.